AFGE GETS MEMBERS MORE TIME OFF

Long ago the Social Security Administration scheduled employees’ lunch periods for them and some people did not get 30 minute unpaid lunch until seven hours into their shift. Their union, AFGE, came up with an ingenious way to soften the blow for those folks. It negotiated a deal with management to let people go home 90 minutes before the end of their shift while charging them only for 60 minutes of leave. (The hour of leave was added to the 30 minute lunch to let them go 90 minutes early.) That worked fine for years until recently when SSA management said it wanted to terminate the arrangement because employees were now free to take their lunch period whenever they wished. The union fought back hard against the change, but the bargaining dispute went to the FSIP for a decision. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining | Tagged | Leave a comment

TEN REASONS TO BE A UNION REPRESENTATIVE

There are lots of good reasons to be a union rep, whether you get involved in grievances, negotiations, arbitrations, employee meetings, or information gathering & analysis.  Here are ten that we hope lead you to think about getting involved. Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

DO YOUR MEMBERS A “LEAVE” FAVOR

Decades ago the federal employee leave rules were simple. If you want a vacation take annual. If you are ill, take sick leave. If you are out of annual or sick, ask for LWOP. And if you do not want to come in on time, the agency will gift you with some AWOL. But thanks to a more sensitive culture and a few flexibilities, there are now leave rules for adopting a child, caring for an injured veteran, caring for a newborn, mourning a family member, and tending to your mom’s broken hip–not to mention leave transfers, banks, and set-aside accounts. Most federal employees move through their careers with only a superficial understanding of all the rules, but wouldn’t it be great if there was some thing or place that would help them easily understand all the leave options they have. Well, there is. Continue reading

Posted in Leave | Tagged | Leave a comment

A QUIZ: WHEN UNIONS’ RIGHTS COLLIDE

Who is right and who is wrong in this situation where the bargaining rights of two unions collided in the parking lot?  IFPTE/NAIL reached a deal with the Navy Shipyard in Newport News over revised agency instructions reassigning parking priorities. The agreement was signed, approved by the agency head, and became effective.  However, as soon as the agency began reassigning parking spaces it realized that the agreement would result in fewer parking spaces for another union.  That union, AFGE, represented employees in a different Navy component that shared a parking lot with the employees working in the component represented by the two unions unaffiliated with AFGE.  So, what happens next? Does the agreement reached by the two unions trump AFGE’s rights to bargain over any change before implementation?  Did AFGE lose any right to bargain over the change because it was made pursuant to an agreement negotiated with another union?  Did AFGE’s rights void the other union’s agreement?

Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining Law | Tagged | 1 Comment

“VAGUE” REASONS TO DENY LEAVE ILLEGAL

Employees are denied leave requests all the time and generally no one on either side of the labor relations arena thinks twice about it because FLRA has held that management has a right to deny leave, approve and then change its mind by denying leave, or even let an employee go on leave and call him/her back no matter how much money the employees loses in hotel reservations, flight costs, etc. But do not forget that this management right has to be exercised consistent with laws and among them are the civil rights acts. Despite FLRA’s decision to hold firm to an interpretation of the “right to assign” that likely can be traced back through the annuls of Plantation Management 101 all the way to the Divine Right of Kings, EEOC has crafted a way for employees denied leave to challenge management’s decision and get compensated. Here is how Rebecca Padilla did it. Continue reading

Posted in Leave | Tagged | Leave a comment

OVERCOMING LR INCOMPETENCE

Here is our hypothetical.  Assume that the union files a grievance alleging a violation of regulation or contract, wins a big back pay award at arbitration, and it is upheld by FLRA when LR files exceptions. Since the courts have no jurisdiction to review an FLRA decision on contract, regulatory or most statutory violations, the case is closed.  No more appeal options? Or is it over? Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration, Back Pay | Tagged | Leave a comment

FLRA’S CONFLICTING BACK PAY CRITERIA

Assume that the head of a large federal employee office somewhere in the Midwest suddenly decided to change employee shift hours.  Instead of everyone’s shift being 8 to 5:30 every day, she announced that on Monday and Friday of each week their shift would be 7 to 4:30. When the union gets ahold of that information the wheels will start turning identifying how it can challenge that decision and the remedy it wants. If the change was made unilaterally, it is a ULP.  But if the change also violates a federal regulation or contract provisions it is a grievance unrelated to a ULP.  What too many practitioners do not realize is that the decision to file a ULP or grievance has a very big impact on whether the employees will get back pay—thanks to a rarely talked about clash of FLRA precedents. Continue reading

Posted in Back Pay | Tagged | Leave a comment

ABA LABOR LAW UPDATE & THE CBP MUSHROOM CLOUD

For those of you out in our blogosphere who like to stay up with the latest twists and turns in federal sector labor law we recommend reading through the American Bar Association’s, “Update on Significant FLRA and Labor and Employment Decisions, 2015-16.” One of the more interesting cases it is following is NTEU’S fight with CBP. Several arbitrators have already ruled the agency owes employees tens, if not hundreds, of millions in back pay for overtime hours they never worked but should have been allowed to work, even though often no one was assigned to work for the times the union claims back pay. The agency appealed to FLRA but lost. Then it took most of those decisions to the U. S. Court of Appeals, only to be turned away. Most recently, NTEU has asked the arbitrators who issued the original decisions to rule on whether the agency is in compliance with their decisions, which brings all of us fed sector practitioners to the brink of some interesting potential case law developments. For example, Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration, ULPs | Tagged | 1 Comment

NTEU TRIPS ITSELF UP ON CBP DISPUTE

When Customs and Border Protection management decided to install new work stations for officers inspecting travelers, NTEU asked to bargain, and one of its demands was that officers be allowed to sit while reviewing travelers’ documents. The agency declared that non-negotiable on the grounds that it excessively interfered with its management rights to determine internal security. NTEU filed a negotiability petition. At about the same time the agency decided to remove any doubt about officer’s rights to sit or suggestion there might be a past practice of allowing that.  So, it issued a memo announcing that effective immediately officers were to stand while inspecting folks. NTEU filed a ULP with FLRA over that. Once FLRA heard about the ULP, it dismissed the union’s negotiability petition on the issue. Any idea why? Continue reading

Posted in Attorney Fees, ULPs | Tagged | 2 Comments

WHO REALLY DESERVES THE BLAME? AFGE KNOWS

It looks like the media is going to spend more than a little time this summer on the story about the horribly long security lines in airports. Congress, as it always does, has moved quickly to cast the blame on the agency for the delays by calling hearings where it gets to stage the process to look as if our elected representatives are fighting for us. But don’t be fooled by the stagecraft because the ONLY people to blame are those in Congress. AFGE highlighted some facts about the TSA delays recently that make it crystal clear who is to blame, “The Transportation Security Administration currently has about 42,000 officers on the job, down from 47,000 in 2013. At the same time, the volume of passengers has risen 15 percent, from 643 million to 740 million.” That, folks, is due to the failure of Congress to fund government. Don’t let neighbors complain about TSA. It is not the “TSA Problem.” It is the “Congressional Problem.” It strikes us that Congress is like an abusive husband who refuses to give his partner (aka wife) enough money to buy food, but then berates her (or worse) for not feeding the family well. Congress has done it to IRS, the VA, TSA and others as part of a PR campaign to hide its long- string of cowardly judgments.

Posted in Lobbying, Whistleblowing | Tagged | 1 Comment