FSIP REJECTS AGENCY’S CWS “ADVERSE IMPACT” CLAIM
While there are cob webs all over the FLRA headquarters thanks to our President’s decision to slow down the administration of justice, some decisions do manage to break free of the morass. A recent one came from the Impasses Panel when an agency tried to reduce the number of employees who would be allowed to continue on a Compressed Work Schedule. The agency claimed that if it could not reduce the number it would create “an adverse impact,” which is the statutory term for the sky is falling, babies are dying, and zombies will be everywhere. Fortunately, the law and regulation require that an agency carries the burden of proving that. When the Bureau of Prisons tried to do that, the Panel outlined why it failed-giving unions a little more clarity on where to punch holes in an agency’s claim. Below is the core of the Panel’s reasoning. Continue reading