IS PUNCTUALITY AN ESSENTIAL JOB ELEMENT?

Most people think so, but now a federal circuit court has raised the possibility that it might not be in every case. For generations employers have fired employees for failing to report to work on time. In this case before the court, the employee had problems arriving on time because of a disability and asked for a reasonable accommodation allowing him to arrive late from time-to-time. Although allowed to do so for a while, the employer changed its mind and suspended him when he was not timely. The employee lost his discrimination case before a U.S. District Court, but the Circuit Court declared that although punctuality was normally essential, “physical presence at or by a specific time is not, as a matter of law, an essential function of all employment.” It sent the case back to the lower court to examine the facts of this individual’s situation rather than merely accepting the employer’s assertion that it is. That opens the door to a potential ruling that there are some jobs where punctuality is not essential.  This will be an interesting case to follow.  See McMillian v. City of New York, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4454 (2d Cir. Mar. 4, 2013),

Posted in ADA/ADAAA, Discipline/Adverse Action | Leave a comment

100,000 NEW UNION MEMBERS

That is how much AFGE’s total membership increased between January 2001 and January 2013. It just reported to the Department of Labor that it has a total of 299,642 members. Congrats to them for all the focus and effort it took to grow so quickly. However, for the first time in those 12 years of growth the union’s total receipts for the year actually dropped, by $7 million dollars, despite a one-year membershoip increase of over 10,000.

Posted in Membership Building | Tagged | Leave a comment

COMPENSATION INCREASES UNIONS CAN BARGAIN(Pt.1)

There are over two dozen ways unions can negotiate to put extra cash in members’ pockets. That is great news for employees during these times of wage freezes and yet another reason they should support their union. Here is our list of compensation issues that FLRA has already held to be negotiable.  In Part 2 we will review those that appear negotiable given FLRA precedent, but which the Authority has not yet squarely addressed. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining, Bargaining Negotiability, Compensation | Tagged , | 2 Comments

SEQUESTER BARGAINING STRATEGY

Once management announces that a furlough is reasonably foreseeable (or any impact on unit employees is likely from sequester), the union has a right to bargain. We already shared our thoughts on some proposals to make in an earlier post; now it is time to share some strategy tips to deal with the probability that many agencies will start implementing the furlough days before bargaining has finished. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BARGAINING FOR BACK PAY

Generally, there is only one way to get back pay. You have to file a grievance, charge or some other allegation against management and, absent settlement, get an authorized neutral, such as an arbitrator, to order back pay. But there is another way. The union can make a bargaining demand for back pay and negotiate to get it. Here is how that would work. Continue reading

Posted in Back Pay, Bargaining | Tagged | Leave a comment

ON-LINE TRAINING IN TRAVEL REGS

If your local has numerous disputes over travel, per diem, and other reimbursement matters, you might want to sign up for the on-line training course GSA offers in the Federal Travel Regs that you can find at  http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103243

Posted in Travel/Per Diem | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BARGAINING OVER SEQUESTRATION’S IMPACT

If your union has not demanded to bargain over the impact of the pending sequestration, do not wait much longer.  The odds of it happening are so high that the union should put in its demand even if management has not provided specific notice, e.g., who get furloughed, for how long, etc..  Everyone has to decide what proposals to submit in their unit given the particular facts.  But here are a few proposal ideas that might be worth considering.  Let employees — Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining | Tagged | 2 Comments

TEST YOURSELF- The Correct OT Remedy

Let’s assume that you find management has incorrectly told some employees over the last nine months that they may only be compensated with comp time to work extra hours, not time-and-one-half overtime pay.  Then, as soon as you point out to LR that the FLSA-covered employees should have received the extra money, it agrees you are right and offers to settle the dispute.  Its offer is to give them the difference between the straight-time salary rate of any comp time they already used and time-and one-half overtime pay.  Unused comp time would be compensated at the full overtime rate.  Is that a good deal? Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration, FLSA/Overtime | Tagged , | Leave a comment

WHEN DECIDING OFFICIALS GO EX PARTE

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals just administered a major smack down to HUD when it let a deciding official (DO) talk to witnesses after management had issued its proposed termination letter. (See Rayland Young v. Dept. of HUD, (Fed. Cir. 2013). The court made it clear yet again that once the proposed adverse action letter has been issued management is almost always barred from collecting additional information about the case.   Continue reading

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FMLA & SICK LEAVE RECORD RULES

EEOC has very specific rules about where employee FMLA and sick leave medical documents can be stored. If the agency violates them, they may owe the employee money damages—as a recent Dept. of Justice case demonstrated. Continue reading

Posted in FMLA, Leave, Privacy | Tagged | Leave a comment