STORIES COMING AFTER THE HOLIDAYS

Against our better judgment we have decided to give in to staff demands for time off during the holidays. We probably could have coerced the Marketing, PR, IT, News, Editorial and Admin staffs into staying, but HR, Legal, Security, and Legislation seemed intent on walking out. They apparently believe that just because we have posted 600 pieces since starting FEDSMILL.com in September 2011 (and having articles read nearly 2,000 times in one, recent, three day period) that they deserve a day off. So, we are shutting down until early January. Soon after we come back we hope to roll out some very meaty postings, such as– Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

THE FLSA GRIEVANCE REMEDY PERIOD

Not long ago we wrote about the very substantial difference between the time period in which a grievance must be filed once learning of a violation and how far back in the past an arbitrator can order the remedy be provided. (See LMR Russian Roulette) For example, if a union knew as early as January 1, 2008 that an agency was doing something it did not like, but did not find a statutory, regulatory or contractual obligation it could enforce through a grievance until January 1, 2014, how far back in the past can the arbitrator order the error corrected, with back pay if necessary, if the grievance was filed on January 15, 2014? Continue reading

Posted in FLSA/Overtime | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHEN SHOULD UNIONS NEGOTIATE OVER GOVERNMENT-WIDE REG CHANGES?

Assume that your contract or some MOU includes a provision that limits the Best Qualified list in a promotion action to the top four rated candidates for a single vacancy. Then imagine that with three years left before the parties can renegotiate that clause OPM implements the following government-wide rule, “Selection procedures will provide for management’s right to select or not select from among a group of best qualified candidates, and the BQ list must contain at least the top six candidates for the first vacancy as determined by their promotion ranking scores.” Obviously, a non-negotiable change in its contract is coming for the union and just as obviously it has the right to negotiate over the impact and implementation of the change. But whether the agency must complete those negotiations before implementing the change depends on when the union invokes bargaining. For example, … Continue reading

Posted in Government-wide Regs | Tagged | Leave a comment

SHOULD EMPLOYERS INVITE EMPLOYEES ON FMLA LEAVE TO HOLIDAY PARTIES?

That seems like a very good question especially around this time of the year. Does it violate the employees’ right to exclude them simply because they are on FMLA leave? So, when the folks running the blog “FMLA Insights” posed it we thought it would be worthwhile to pass on their perspective on the question. We recommend that you link over to their cite to see what they have to say.

 

Posted in FMLA | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHEN HR DISRESPECTS DECIDING OFFICIALS

Sitting as the deciding official over a proposed adverse action is a big deal.  Not only does the DO have to respect employee Constitutional rights, but also the requirements of law, regulation, agency policy, past practice, and collective bargaining.  It is not an easy job and as a result some deciding officials sleep walk through the process only doing what the HR Specialist tells them to do.  That can be a very costly mistake for the agency when the employee’s representative catches them doing that—as one MSPB case made clear. Continue reading

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action | Tagged | Leave a comment

EEOC PROVIDES ADA GUIDANCE FOR EMPLOYEES’ DOCTORS

If you have ever been involved with a disabled employee’s request for a reasonable accommodation, you know that a lot depends of what the employee’s doctor does and writes.  EEOC just gave them a little help that a number of law firms have broken down into even more helpful English.  Here is one from Constangy, Brooks, Smith and Prophete, LLP that is worth reading over for future reference. It would seem to apply under the federal employee Rehabilitation Act as well.

Posted in ADA/ADAAA | Tagged | Leave a comment

FMLA QUIZ: WHO IS RIGHT AND WHO IS NOT?

Here are the facts of a 2015 MSPB decision in an adverse action suspension case.  See if you remember the right answer. 

The employee left the office the morning of September 5 due to debilitating stomach cramps, making it to his car with the help of some of his colleagues and then driving far enough to get off post, where he parked until his cramping subsided. He then drove the short distance remaining to his home, where he went straight into a dark room he uses when he has a strong migraine and collapsed. Two days later he notified his supervisor that he left the office unannounced due to an urgent health need on September 5 and requested intermittent FMLA leave on an emergency basis to cover the absence.  He also asked that the absence be compensated via a request for advance credit hours.  The supervisor refused to approve the request for advance credit hours and charged him with AWOL because he failed to request and receive leave approval before departing the office on September 5, as required by the agency’s leave instruction The two-day delay was unacceptable.  The agency maintained that, because the appellant was able to drive himself home and to call his daughter, he was therefore able to give notice before he left the office that morning and, because he did not do so, he was AWOL. It then suspended him for 30 days. Do you believe the suspension should be upheld or overturned? Continue reading

Posted in FMLA | Tagged | Leave a comment

FLRA OFFERS TUTORIAL SLIDES FOR BARGAINING OVER OFFICE MOVES

While we are not about to call it absolutely the best advice any LR practitioner can get on how to bargain over office moves, if you are involved in that situation now or in the near future check out FLRA’s free slides designed to guide practitioners through the process.

Posted in Bargaining | Tagged | Leave a comment

AFGE CELEBRATES ITS NOT-SO-SECRET SUCCESS FORMULA

Even a quick check of AFGE’s current  national newsletter will give you an idea of how proud and happy the union is to have achieved an on-going level of 300,000 dues paying members. While all but one of the more recognizable federal employee unions reported a membership increase to DOL for 2014, AFGE has become the indisputable long-term pacesetter for union membership growth. We intermittently have touched on why it has thrived when other unions are shrinking or at least just growing incrementally.  But it might help others if we pulled from our individual posts to create a reasonably thorough, ten-item list of how AFGE did it.

Most of the story begins around the year 2000 when the leader of a large council of social security locals upset the in-house favorite to become National President. Here is what happened soon after that. Continue reading

Posted in Membership Building | Tagged , | 1 Comment

FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS VIDEO

Whistleblowing laws have changed a lot in the last few years and most of the change has been good for employees.  Union reps should make sure they can spot the situations where employees qualify for whistleblower rights.  We are going to spend more time on the concept over the next few weeks, but the Office of the Special Counsel has put out a good video explaining the basics of this area of employee rights.

Posted in Whistleblowing | Tagged | Leave a comment