THE STATUTE AND CASE LAW DECISION YOUR UNION WILL NEVER EVER TELL YOU ABOUT

Every union member has a critically important right that their union prays the member knows nothing about.  Back in 1959 a law “was enacted after lengthy congressional investigations disclosed that in many instances, union officials had run unions as private fiefdoms, in utter defiance of the interests of members….” The goal of that law, i.e., the LMRDA, was to “end ‘autocratic rule by placing the ultimate power in the hands of members, where it rightfully belongs . . .’ ” Mallick v. International Brotherhood of Electric Workers, 749 F.2d 771, 777 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (Mallick I).  And one of the rights it gave each member was the right to see and audit the union’s books.  There is a legal decision from the U.S. Dept. of  Labor that spells this all out and how to do it.  Chicago District Director, OLMS v. National Council Of Field Labor Locals, Council 73, AFGE, CASE NO: 98-SOC-1. Has your union ever told you about that right? If not, let me. Continue reading

Posted in Reports/Finances | Tagged | Leave a comment

IT IS “FOLLOW THE UNION MONEY” TIME AGAIN

Want to know how your union is spending dues money, e.g., who is getting paid what, which outside contractors-consultants-counsels have been hired, how often the union went to arbitration last year, etc.? Well, as of December 31st each year union whose fiscal year ends in October—and most do, file reports with the Dep’t. of Labor detailing all that. And all those reports are available to you on the web.  Here is how to access your union’s report or any other unions. Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

FMLA TO CARE FOR SIBLINGS?

We have said it before and will say it again.  Fedsmill is not a legal advisor.  We will leave that to your union lawyers. Fedsmill, on the other hand,  advocate for things that help federal employees and unions, whether they are sure winners or not. So, if we run across an idea, we will likely pass it on to you to try. One such idea came across our screen this morning in the form of a post from the FMLA Insight folks.  They advised their readers of a court decision upholding the right of a private sector employee to use FMLA to care for a sibling. You can click on the story which is entitled,  “No Sibling Rivalry Here: Court Green Lights Potential FMLA Leave for Siblings.”  We recommend you look through it and probably let folks in your  a bargaining unit that the union is likely to go to bat for them if they are in a similar situation.

Posted in FMLA | Tagged | Leave a comment

A “TIGHTY WHITEY” AND WORKPLACE RETALIATION

We have written about the advantages of alleging reprisal/retaliation claims whenever you represent an employe complaining about workplace harassment. Check out this January 2023 post. But it never hurts to remind reps of that, especially when you can do so with a easy to remember story.  The folks over at Constangey, Brooks, Smith & Prophete just published a story about an employee wearing only a tighty whitey at his workplace.  It is a very quick read and one we recommend you click over to check out.

Posted in EEO Harassment, Retaliation | Tagged | Leave a comment

CONGRATS TO AFGE LEADERS AT SSA ON TELEWORK MANEUVER

They just signed a deal with SSA management to keep telework in place for six more years.  While that is not fool-proof protection against Shadow President Musk’s ranting about forcing all feds back to their offices, it is the next best thing.  Management will be required to bargain with unions before they can terminate telework, whether the union has a contract guarantee of it or not. But a contract like this will give the union extra arguments to insist that telework stays in place at least until the contract terminates.  Under the FLRA’s latest decision about the remedy for when an agency unilaterally terminates telework, a premature change would cost agencies dearly. Click here.

Posted in Telework | Tagged | Leave a comment

OVERHEARD AT LUNCH; BRACE YOURSELVES UNIONS

Last week I met a friend for lunch at a little place in Washington, D.C. and overheard some very troubling chatter from an adjacent table.  Given the city is overrun with Congressional members, staffers, lobbyists, and other wanna-be policy wonks, loose lips are everywhere, especially with a White House transition in the offing. The three nearby chatty characters in question were talking about Trump’s team considering a proposal to furlough almost all IRS agents to give the country a one-year holiday from deep state audits. Continue reading

Posted in Furloughs | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHAT IS AN AGGRAVATING FACTOR?

Looks like we Feds are going to be dealing with a lot more adverse actions soon if Trump’s Department of Efficiency has its way. Given that MSPB just issued a new precedent setting adverse action decision this is  a great time to begin brushing up on defenses that unions can raise to help employees. And that brings us to the concept of “aggravating factors.”  Continue reading

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action | Tagged | Leave a comment

HAD A GREAT TIME …

last week meeting with 35 union reps from around the country to review and discuss about two dozen legal precedents and tactics they can draw on to deal with the upcoming Trump Administration’s certain assault on unions, unions reps, and employees.  Lots of different unions represented and lots of ideas shared. Wish we could share what we discussed, but now is not the time to alert the Trump folks to what awaits them.

Posted in Bargaining | Tagged | Leave a comment

THE CHERNOBYL INCIDENT AT NRC

There is a mushroom cloud climbing into the sky over the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that was triggered by management’s incompetence. NRC fired an employee for unacceptable performance back in 2018 and now must pay her around a million dollars in back plus retro leave earnings, etc. because the MSPB ruled its entire performance appraisal system sucks.  The decision lays out some standards MSPB demands appraisal systems meet before agencies can terminate employees that all unions should make sure their own agencies’ system meet. It is my guess there are a few agencies out there that similarly fail to have a legal critical element system.. Here are some details from Latisha A. Zepeda,  v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2024 MSPB 14 (October 30, 2024).  Continue reading

Posted in Performance | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNION NEGOTIATOR’S QUIZ

Imagine you are in this situation.  You are in term negotiations and the agency refused to bargain over three provisions that have been in the agreement for more than a decade.  It claims they are suddenly non-negotiable.  When the larger dispute went to the Panel for resolution, in line with its anti-union approach to life no matter how much it hurt employees, the Panel ruled that it would resolve all the disputes except for the ones the agency alleged to be non-negotiable. When the Panel spit out a final decision, the agency implemented it as soon as possible.  As for the three provisions the Panel did not address, the agency simply replaced the existing agreement language with its own last proposal. One of the proposals provided that employees could choose the shift they worked on by seniority, e.g., the 7 a.m. to 3:30 pm shift or the 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. shift.   What does the union do now if it believes that existing FLRA case removes any doubt about the negotiability of the proposals? Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining | Tagged | Leave a comment