LOOKING AHEAD TO THE TRUMP RIFS

At the White House’s request agencies are preparing their systems to execute RIF’s in the next few months. One defense to a RIF is to argue that it has an inordinate impact on one or more classes of employees protected under the Civil Rights Acts. Because every employee is protected in one class or another under those laws, including the white male, unions should have already started to request the data they will need to determine if there will be an illegal adverse impact on any class.  The easiest way to do that is to file an information request with the agency requesting the performance appraisal scores of each employee for the last four years by race, gender, national origin, age, year of score, etc. It  would be wise to request other data as well, e.g., each employee’s job title, grade, location, SCD date, veteran’s status, competitive area, competitive level, etc. And of course, you do not need to have the agency identify the employee’s name or other PPI. Raw data will do. Agencies will use these scores to decide how many extra points to give employees in determining their RIF scores. The more points, the less likelihood that the employee will be RIF’d. For example, …   Continue reading

Posted in RIF | Tagged | Leave a comment

BE ON THE LOOKOUT (BOLO ALERT)

The senseless, wasteful, vindictive RIFs are coming.  Most unions have negotiated RIF procedures into their agreements, which is going to seriously damage their ability to demand negotiations before the RIF can take place. That’s thanks to the covered-by doctrine. (More on that soon.) But there is a possibility that unions can slow the RIF train down if they can find that the agency has made a change in anything that plays a significant role in the RIF determination process. For example, has the agency changed competitive areas, competitive levels, performance appraisal details, etc.?  If so, the union should demand to bargain as soon as it gets official notice of a pending RIF. The agency will probably ignore you under direct orders from Tesla Headquarters, the real seat of our government. But the union can then file a ULP grievance asking to overturn the RIF, reinstate everyone with back pay and benefits, adjust annuities for those who have retired in the interim, and finish bargaining.  So, scour your agency regs for changes, dig up the former competitive area/level documents, file information requests, etc. The potential payoff is huge to so many families.

 

Posted in RIF | Leave a comment

FMLA BRAIN TEASER

One of our favorite blogs is operated by the law firm of Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete and entitled “Employment and Labor Insider.” It posted a piece this week about an odd FMLA situation that challenges all us to think more deeply what this law does for our members.  Click here to read their FMLA Brain Teaser.

Posted in FMLA | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHAT RETURNING PROBATIONERS ARE NOW OWED

Now that thousands of probationary employees are coming back to their desks, it is time to pay attention  to the remedies they are entitled to. It is a longer list than you might imagine. Here is our list of things local union reps need to pay attention to. We suggest reps seek out retrurning probationers to inform them of all they are owsed, suggest they contact the union if something go wrong, remind them that it was unions that got them their jobs back and of course leave them a SF-1187. Continue reading

Posted in Probation Period | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS IN A RIF, MASS FIRING OF PROBATIONERS, DIRECTED REASSIGNMENT REMOVAL OR DEFERRED RESIGNATION

The lethal litigators at the Gilbert Employment Laws, PC in Silver Spring Maryland are working hard to help federal employees.  They not only filed a well-researched class action with the MSPB to overturn the harm to damaged feds, but they are putting together helpful blog posts.  We borrowed the title of one for the title of this post and are sending it along to you, if you click here. We are sure that you have members that are intensely interested in the unemployment benefits available to them once the Musk machete takes a swing at them.

Posted in Unemployment | Tagged | Leave a comment

“SHE IS ON MEDICATION”

A supervisor asked a contractor to keep an eye on an employee who had yelled and cursed on the job that day and to report back to him about any further incidents. The supervisor then told the contractor that the employee “is on medication.”  What the supervisor did as described in the first sentence above is ok, but what he did in the second sentence violates law even though it may seem like a tiny, single incident.  Continue reading

Posted in Medical Issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

OOPS, THEY DID IT AGAIN. SELECTING OFFICIALS WHO CAN’T EXPLAIN THEIR ACTIONS

Like Brittany Spears’ song, some selecting officials are still getting “lost in the game,”  and in the process hurting those around them.  In this case, an employee over 40 years-old applied for a promotion to a supervisory position and made the BQ list, only to be passed over for a 36 year old.  It was the 31st time since 2006 that he had been passed over for promotion, which also happened to be the last year the agency selected anyone older than 37 for promotion. When the employee filed an age discrimination complaint, the selecting official (SO) explained that he chose the younger employee because he was the “best qualified” for the job of the 20 candidates on the BQ list. The SO outlined how he had talked to several managers about the BQ candidates, but provided no notes or details from those conversations to back up his conclusion. Here is how the case went to a very quick victory, retroactive promotion and back pay for the employee.   Continue reading

Posted in Promotion/Hiring | Tagged | Leave a comment

THE MSPB STAY OF PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE TERMINATIONS

Click here for a short overview on what is happening with this extremely welcomed decision from the folks at Democracy Now, who are doing very creative legal work for federal employees. And here is a copy of the brief the Special Counsel filed to get the stay.

Posted in Probation Period | Tagged | Leave a comment

FOR ALL US FMLA GROUPIES

I know that some union locals have designated stewards who handle all their FMLA matters.  The rest need to be able to get answers quickly when a member knocks on the door with an FMLA problems.  The American Bar Association issues an annual report on the latest developments in FMLA law. While there are some slight differences between what private and federal sector entitlements are, this ABA report is a great resource for a union. It not only might alert a union to a wrinkle in the law it was unaware of if it takes the time to page through it, but also give a union rep a good idea of what must be done when an employee needs help.  You can find the link to it in this post from FMLA Insights: “A Winter Treat! The ABA’s Summary of 2024 FMLA Court Decisions Has Arrived.”

Posted in FMLA | Tagged | Leave a comment

SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENTS: PROBATIONERS AND THE PRIVACY ACT

If you are not heartbroken about what King Kruel has done to thousands of innocent federal probationary employees, then you likely spent your childhood pulling wings off flies and lighting random fires. He took their jobs away, he took their health insurance away,  and he made their futures so much harder by officially firing them for poor performance. I understand why he had to accuse them of being poor performers. He needed some reason and alleged poor performance is very, very difficult to appeal. But now every fired probationer will have to declare on future job applications that they were fired for being poor performers. If those applications go through machine scans, they will be screened out without any human every looking at them. Many probationers are also going to have a hard time getting unemployment insurance quickly because many states penalize you for being fired—as if it is always the employee’s fault. But what about the Privacy Act?  Continue reading

Posted in Privacy, Probation Period | Tagged | Leave a comment