IRS FOOLISHLY BARRED FROM PURSUING RICH TAX CHEATS

Tax cheats are important to union officials because their theft is one of the major reasons feds do not get proper annual pay increases or enough staffing to do the job. The Dept. of Treasury has reported that 879,415 “high income” Americans did not even file tax returns recently, costing the government $45.7 billion in taxes. The reason this happen is that IRS’ staff has been systematically reduced by those in Congress who consider it their primary duty to take care of the rich beyond excessive direct tax cuts.  For example, in 1995 IRS had 113,643 employees to tend to the filings from 265 million citizens.  But after a lot of rhetoric attacking IRS without a single proven allegation of wrongdoing, Congress has reduced the IRS staff over two decades to 73,519 in 2018 despite the population having grown by 62 million Americans. These fictitious attacks on IRS were led by Sen. Roth, (Rep. DE) and Congressman Darrell Issa, (Rep. CA).  In a perfect world, all unions would ban together with other organizations hurt by this theft to insist that Congress restore IRS funding.  Not only would that slash tax cheating by the rich who do not even bother to file returns, but it would also boost funding for the many federal programs that help the people at the income levels of their union members. Unions are not going to get this problem fixed if they continue to do in the future what they have done in the past. Someone needs to make forming a large alliance for change a passionate project.

Posted in Lobbying | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNION REP TEST #7 (Probationary Employee Rights)

Newly hired probationary employees sometimes decide not to join the union because they think it cannot do a thing for them if they are fired.  They could not be more wrong about that. Test your own knowledge of all the appeal routes available to probationers to challenge a dismissal.  Read through the list below and mark whether probationers can appeal to a neutral outside the agency in that situation or not. The answer are at the end of the test situations. Continue reading

Posted in Probation Period, Union Rep Test | Tagged | Leave a comment

IS ROCKET BARGAINING LEGAL?

One of the two parties involved in negotiating a term agreement is usually far more eager to get the deal done ASAP than the other one.  When the FSIP is loaded with anti-union political operatives, rather than actual labor relations professionals, as it is today, the eager party is management. And the fastest way to get a final deal is to propose in ground rules bargaining that once the negotiation begins it continue nonstop until FMCS mediation has concluded.  That is then followed by a momentary pause before FSIP takes over and rubber stamps whatever the agency is demanding. If the union will not agree to that voluntarily, the agency asks the Panel to impose it. It is a great scheme for management, but is it legal?  There is good reason to believe it is not legal for the agency to insist to impasse on a schedule that rockets the union through the bargaining process to which it is entitled by statute. For example, … Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining Tactics | Tagged | Leave a comment

TRUMP’S EXECUTIVE ORDERS HOG TIE AGENCY GROUND RULE NEGOTIATORS

Traditionally, there are four things agencies want from unions when bargaining ground rules for reopening a term agreement. This is particularly true during times when the FSIP is heavily biased against unions, e.g., 2001-08, 2017 to the present, etc. But, the President’s anti-union executive orders have made it almost impossible to get those concessions from unions now. Chalk that up to a big dose of irony or just plain old lack of forethought, but the result is the same.  Agency negotiators are hog tied by their own President if unions want to use the power Trump unwittingly gave them. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining Law, Bargaining Tactics | Tagged | Leave a comment

ACCOMMODATING COVID-19 AT-RISK EMPLOYEES (EEOC GUIDANCE)

We like to let our subscribers know when something pops up on the web that should be useful to them.  This piece, posted by the folks at California Dental Association, offers some practical advice about how at-risk employees can be COVID-19 accommodated during this period.  With the more and more Feds being recalled to their job sites every day, this issue is bound to come up in most bargaining units.  You might want to send members an e-mail telling them that if they are in the at-risk group, they should contact the union for help. Here is where you can find the post.

Posted in Reasonable Accommodations | Tagged | Leave a comment

ARBITRATOR PRITZKER, YOU ARE DEAD WRONG   

Malcolm Pritzker, an experienced DC arbitrator, recently ruled that an agency (SSA) violated the law by withholding information from the union (AALJ) during bargaining.  The agency withheld the information, sped the dispute to the FSIP, and got one of the Panel’s politically-patented anti-union decisions imposing working conditions that employees must now live with. The union requested that Pritzker void the conditions imposed on them and return the parties to the bargaining table to negotiate in good faith this time.  Pritzker, however, refused to do that.  He wrote, “I do not have the right to interfere with the procedures of the impasses panel or to intervene in the collective bargaining process, and I will not order the reopening of the negotiations between the parties.” He could not be more wrong for the following seven reasons.  Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration, Remedies | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNION REP TEST #6 (FMLA)

The COVID crisis is going to create a lot of traffic for union stewards from employees with an entire range of FMLA questions.  The web and other fed employee news sites currently are loaded with information about the FMLA-related Leave Provisions of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), but employees will inevitably want to know more about their core FMLA rights.  Check out this FMLA quiz from our blogging buddies at the law firm of Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP which will help you dust off some things you knew and might have forgotten or fill in some gaps in your FMLA readiness.

Posted in Union Rep Test | Tagged | 1 Comment

WELL ISN’T THIS AN INTERESTING UNION COVID RESPONSE

Some enterprising legal eagles in New York City just filed a class action lawsuit claiming that an employer must provide reasonable accommodations to employees at risk of catching COVID-19 at the job site.  Their claim is based on the requirements of the ADAAA and Rehabilitation Act. So, how long will it be before some federal union files a similar claim with EEOC to force an employer to provide fed employees reasonable accommodation? It is unlikely the union could file on behalf of all federal employees at once or even all in one bargaining unit.  But if they narrow the class to those with common employment conditions this just might work.  Legal action might be all it takes to force an agency to allow employees to continue to telework despite the President groveling for someone—anyone—to go back to the office.  If an agency does no relent, then the employees just might be eligible for reinstatement of any leave they have to take, compensatory damages, attorney fees, and a few other remedies. If you want to know more about an employee’s right to a reasonable accommodation to deal with COVID-19, check out Section D of this new EEOC issuances.

Posted in Disability | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNION REP TEST #5 (Negotiations –An Agency’s Specific Notice Obligation)

We have said it often before.  The biggest process mistake management can make while bargaining is to violate this obligation, and aggressive enforcement of this obligation by the union increases its visibility, credibility, and bargaining clout.  Simply stated, the law requires management to give the union “specific notice” of any change in conditions of employment before the agency can implement the change. But there are a lot of subtleties and details union negotiators should know well.  We have posed 10 True-False questions below followed by the answers.  Test yourself to get a sense of how well you know this area of law. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining Law, Union Rep Test | Tagged | 1 Comment

UNION REP TEST #4 (EEO- Medical Information Privacy)

The rehabilitation Act prohibits managers from disclosing physical or mental medical information they have about an employee to anyone without a legitimate reason to know.  Nonetheless, managers repeatedly ignore the rule and violate the employee’s right to privacy. Consequently, it will help employees get corrective action including money damages if union reps are familiar with the many situations in which the law is violated.  Below are a series of situations where medical information was disclosed.  See if you can identify the ones where the law was violated and those where the manager did nothing wrong. The answers are at the end of the quiz questions. Continue reading

Posted in Medical Issues, Privacy, Union Rep Test | Tagged | Leave a comment