AGENCIES MAY HAVE TO BARGAIN WITH UNIONS OVER EMPLOYEE DATA BREACHES

The NLRB recently indicated it believes employers are obligated to bargain when employee data they hold is hacked. Take a look at this article, Employers May Have to Bargain With Unions Over Response to Employee Data Breaches

Issues can range from the quality of the ID theft protection the agency implements to protect those whose data was stolen to an agency decision to do nothing. So far, nothing blocks a union from demanding changes when it opens its term contract.

Posted in Bargaining Law | Tagged | Leave a comment

FLRA REGIONAL OFFICE SEMINARS AVAILABLE

FLRA just distributed the announcement below.  We have found these meetings interesting and helpful.  Sign up fast before all the seats are gone. Continue reading

Posted in FLRA | Tagged | Leave a comment

A PLEASANT PARTICULARIZED NEED PRONOUNCEMENT: Test Yourself

A nice thing happened last week.  The Authority issued an easier to understand than normal, unanimous decision on particularized need.  (AFGE, 68 FLRA 492 (2015))  See if you can predict what the ruling was from the facts below.  It is also an important case because it addressed whether a union can get information merely to examine the validity of a management decision that it had every right to make without bargaining over the substance of the decision. The union had not yet filed a grievance or demanded bargaining. Continue reading

Posted in Information | Tagged | Leave a comment

NTEU’S JUNK YARD DOGS DIG UP EVEN MORE CBP MILLIONS

Less than four months ago we wrote about how FLRA had upheld an arbitrator’s decisions awarding what likely will be over $100 million in back pay to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officers because management violated the law about how to schedule employees.  Well, FLRA just upheld another NTEU arbitration victory that orders back pay as far back at the late 90’s and that is likely to generate just as much money.  This case proves so many things about how an agency should not operate a labor relations program, but before we get to those lessons learned, let’s review what happened. Continue reading

Posted in Back Pay, Overtime, ULPs | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHAT’S NEXT FOR NTEU—AND YOU?

There are two reasons why NTEU might have a big impact on your union soon.  First, it is about to install a new national leadership after 16 years under the current one. New leaders often mean substantial changes. In fact, if new leaders do not try new things the organization usually deteriorates because the policies and perspectives of the past almost always lose their effectiveness with time.   Second, unlike all the AFL-CIO affiliated unions that are prohibited from raiding one another, as an independent union NTEU is free to raid wherever it likes—and with over $40 million in the bank it has the cash to do it. So, we thought we would share with you the brainstorming we have been doing about the options NTEU has for its future—and yours. Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNDERSTANDING CATEGORY RATING SYSTEMS

As we have said before, category rating is brimming with opportunities for agency HR and managers to abuse the process.  There are very few rules, and MSPB has consistently looked the other way so that there is no public hard data about just what agencies are doing. For those unfamiliar with Category Rating, it replaces ranking candidates by their numerical score in favor of putting them in one of two broadly defined qualification categories.  Once they are placed, management has the ability to select anyone in the category, although veterans in the category usually must be considered before others in the category.  Consequently, an applicant who might have otherwise been rated ten points below other candidates can get selected over them because there are no numerical scores. Given MSPB’s cowering, it falls to unions to challenge category rating selections when their members are passed over.  OPM has posted some information about the concept in its archives. The FedSoup people also have a decent explanation of what category rating is about. And the law firm of Passman & Kaplan have posted material which could help union reps. But before you put together a plan, be sure to read a journal article published by Xavier University  that looks beyond all the OPM PR blather about how great this is to reveal its fundamental flaws. Here are some things we would build into our plan: Continue reading

Posted in Promotion/Hiring | Tagged | Leave a comment

ASPERGER’S SYNDROME, THE INABILITY TO INTERACT WITH OTHERS & ADA       

Some of us are shy, some are introverts, some of us have Asperger’s Syndrome and some of us have other conditions interfering with our ability to interact with others in what our TV-conditioned culture considers to be normal.  What happens when a member suffers this problem and it interferes with his/her work?  Maybe they get left out of informal groups or clicks that influence many workplace decisions, maybe they find it hard to get co-workers to cooperate with them, maybe they have serious problems when placed in high conflict situations or maybe their manager just not have a “good feeling” about their “meet and deal” skills leading to low evaluations. Although there is not a lot of case law behind this yet, the Americans With Disabilities Act, as amended, is slowly providing some help.  We ran across a thoughtful article from a law firm recently that gives a quick review of developments that might help you help a member someday.  Check it out.  We touched on the issue ourselves a few months ago.

Posted in EEO/Disabilities | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHEN PERFORMANCE AWARDS ARE DISCRETIONARY

What’s a union to do when management distributes cash performance awards as it sees fit without any negotiated formal criteria?  A lot, even if the FSIP said the agency could do it that way. The agency still must comply with all relevant the laws and regulations–and there are several a union could use to make the agency regret insisting on total discretion. We have covered some in previous posts concerning disparate impact claims. So, let’s look at some others by describing what it would look like if managers had complete discretion.  Continue reading

Posted in Awards | Tagged | Leave a comment

UNION STAFF AS OFFICER CANDIDATES

We were surprised by a reaction to a recent FEDSMILL posting noting that union staff or employees can run for national union office. So we thought we would do a quick review of the law and activity in this area by touching on four things to know about this.  First, it is up to the union’s convention body to determine whether to allow paid union staff members, who have never worked in a bargaining unit represented by the union, to be members of the union. AFGE, NAGE and NTEU clearly allow hired staff without any federal employee experience to become members.  NATCA, on the other hand, limits membership only to those who have been Air Traffic Controllers or in another aviation safety occupation represented by the union. Second, Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHICH BATHROOM FOR TRANSGENDER EMPLOYEES?

Here are the facts. Tamara Lusardi was working for the Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center in Huntsville, Alabama.  As a known transgender employee, the agency forced her to only use a single-use restroom. When it was out of order and she used the women’s room, she was repeatedly confronted by a supervisor and was often referred to by her former male name and with male pronouns. She filed a complaint with the U.S. Special Counsel and EEOC. Here is what happened. Continue reading

Posted in Transgender | Tagged | Leave a comment