WE ARE GONE FOR A WHILE

As is our practice here at the Fedsmill conglomerate, we are calling together all our writers, analysts, undercover plants, snitches, and Chechen hackers on the payroll for a powwow about how to deal with Trump, Musk, and the rest of the Fed-haters.  We have rented a Trulli for each to shield ourselves from overhead spy satellites, drones and death rays. This will take a couple of weeks because the Chechens and snitches do  not get along. We will miss you. When we get back we will catch you up on anything that happens in the interim. Ciao!

Posted in Union Rights | Tagged | Leave a comment

A NEGOTIATOR’S ROOKIE MISTAKE & APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS

This is one of those case law precedents that union negotiators cannot hear enough. If your proposals are all non-negotiable, you give the employer the right to unilaterally implement its proposed midterm change. It can walk away from the table and not look back. But there is a way to reduce the risk of making a proposal(s) that might be non-negotiable. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining Negotiability | Tagged | Leave a comment

TEST YOURSELF- FMLA, DISABILITIES, AND LIGHT DUTY

An employee, Jessie Crutch, had a long-time reasonable accommodation of being allowed to rest his hip for a few minutes every few hours while working as a warehouse custodian.  As the injury got worse and management less tolerant of his need to sit for a few times a day, he started to take time off using his FMLA rights to rest his hip.   When he returned after two days of FMLA leave, he submitted the same medical documentation he always did, namely that he could perform all his duties but needed intermittent periods to sit. However, his supervisor informed him that he would not be permitted to work again until he either submitted new medical documentation certifying that he no longer needed to rest his hip during the work day or he submitted a formal request for light duty.  So, Crutch went home.  While a sad situation for Crutch, are there any violations of law and regulation here? Continue reading

Posted in FMLA | Tagged | Leave a comment

DON’T RIF BORDER PATROL; REDEPLOY THEM

There must be tickles and giggles all around DOGE these days at the mushrooming number of CBP Border Patrol Agents they can label excess and RIF. Billions and billions of easy savings are just a phone call away from Elon demanding that the Agents turn in their badges and assume the position-at the unemployment office that is.  After all, today’s Border Patrol staffing was designed to counter the rampaging hoards who were streaming across our borders like a zombie apocalypse, eating our cats and dogs, taking those cushy lawn cutting jobs, and luxuriating in those janitorial toilet cleaning gigs. But now that the agents teamed up to get Trump elected and their boy has shut down the flow through a simple suspension of Constitutional rights, it is time for them to get off the public dole, sapping the dollars that could be creating more billionaires. But we are here to say, “Don’t RIF Terminate Them” because… Continue reading

Posted in RIF | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHAT IS THE REMEDY FOR AWS/CWS VIOLATIONS?

Lots of unions are out there filing grievances against management decisions to unilaterally terminate or change AWS/CWS schedules, e.g., 5/4/9, 4/10, etc. They are accusing agencies of violating contract provisions, CFR regulations, and unfair labor practices. They are asking for the schedules to be reinstituted, but if that is all they are seeking they are missing something big, i.e., a great remedy or two.  Here is why. Continue reading

Posted in AWS, Grievance/Arbitration, Remedies | 2 Comments

WHAT PER SE EEO REPRISAL?

The EEOC has held that attempting to dissuade an employee from participating in the EEO process is a per se violation of the EEOC’s regulations against interference in the EEO process. Lewis v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 01922440 (Apr. 14, 1994) (attempts by management to dissuade an employee from filing a sexual harassment complaint are “unequivocally prohibited by the regulations…”); Mindy O. v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., EEOC Appeal No. 0720150010 (Sept. 2, 2016). If you or someone you are resenting experiences this, filing a charge could generate some money for the employee even if the underlying EEO discrimination complaint is a loser. For more details see Deandre Y., v. Terence Emmert, Act’g Sec’y, Navy,  EEOC No. 2024004195 (2025)

Posted in EEO/Discrimination | Tagged | Leave a comment

SOME HELP FOR DEPARTING IRS EMPLOYEES

Life is miserable for many IRS employees as Elon and The Donald  wipe out the IRS workforce so they can prepare to contract all the work IRS employees do to campaign donors.  But a group of former IRS executives have made a wonderful effort to help the soon-to-be-unemployed by establishing a web site full of information that could help them apply for other jobs and otherwise handle the transition. careersupport4u.com We are passing it along and hope that all our IRS readers, especially union activists, will forward the web site address on to ALL employees.  Here is their message. Continue reading

Posted in RIF | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHAT CAN UNIONS DO ANYMORE FOR MEMBERS?

Now that Trump has declared that suddenly hundreds of thousands of feds are involved in national security work, those employees’ unions have lost the right to bargain contracts, take grievances to arbitration, and demand certain kinds of information.  Consequently, a lot of employees are probably questioning why they should bother to pay dues anymore.  Well, there are a bundle of good reasons to remain union members that The Revengernator has not taken away from employees and their unions. For example, unions can still represent employees before third party officials in the following situations: Continue reading

Posted in Union Rights | Tagged | 2 Comments

USERRA PROTECTIONS BROADENED BY DOLE ACT

We are passing along a very useful article from a law firm about how those feds with military service, including those feds who are FEMA Reservists, now have greater protections under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.  It is not something that comes up often for union reps, but that does not mean it can be ignored. Here is the article.

Posted in USERRA | Tagged | Leave a comment

DON’T BET AGAINST THIS HAPPENING NEAR YOU

Somewhere early in this new White House Administration some probationary employee is going to be fired because some higher up thinks the employee does not support the new President’s political views or because some campaign contributor to the new President’s campaign complained about the employee.  When that does happen a lot of folks are going to tell the probationer that s/he has no right of appeal—but every one of them will be wrong. When a probationer is fired for what appears to be political reason they can appeal to MSPB. There is a wonderful article by an attorney at Shaw, Bransford and Roth entitled, MSPB: Agencies Terminate Probationary Employees for Political Reasons At Their Own Peril .  We recommend you look it over just so that you can be on the lookout for one of your members being fired or political reasons.  In the case discussed in the article the employee got his job back, back pay, and career status.

 

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action, Political Discrimination | Tagged | 1 Comment