THE “PLAINLY SUPERIOR” PROMOTION GRIEVANCE THEORY

Never heard of it?  It is the argument to use when grieving non-selection from a list of properly ranked and rated best qualified employees.  At least this is one of the ways. Here is how it worked for Gina Potter of the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Dept. of Agriculture in EEOC No. 0720120029 (Sept. 2013). Ms. Potter, a GS-7 employee, applied for promotion to a GS-8/9 position in the same line of work.  Twelve employees applied for the two vacancies and when Potter was passed over, she filed an EEO charge claiming it was due to sex and race (Caucasian) discrimination.  The agency rejected her complaint claiming that her experience and training were not as good as other candidates.  It also claimed that she often created conflict needlessly.  But when the EEOC hearing began, witnesses testified under oath, documentary evidence was uncovered, and the real fun began. Continue reading

Posted in EEO/Discrimination, Promotion/Hiring | Tagged | Leave a comment

SES MAFIA FAMILIES

If the term “mafia” is defined as a culturally-based organized criminal enterprise, then a good argument can be made that there is an active one operating within the Senior Executive Service (SES)–complete with its own territories, families, capos, earning scams, swag, and protection.    Continue reading

Posted in Back Pay | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHY AFGE SHOULD LEAVE THE AFL-CIO

AFGE has been adding members faster than almost any other union in the country—over 100,000 the last 12 years. Obviously, it knows how to organize and how to convince employees to join. So, we want to take this opportunity to argue that it makes no sense for it to stay in the AFL-CIO which prohibits all member unions from organizing employees currently in other AFL-CIO unions.  It makes no sense for the Federation’s future, AFGE’s future, or for the employees who are barred from moving over to AFGE no matter how much it would help them.  Ironically, it makes no sense for agency leaders either. Here’s why. Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

NTEU BREAKS THROUGH CONTRACTING OUT BARRIER

Unions have had a hard time even slowing agencies down in their pursuit of outside contractors.  OMB removed a lot of the issues from negotiations by issuing a detailed government-wide regulation. The Supreme Court tried its damnedest to minimize union rights to bargain over contracting out.  And arbitrators have moved timidly even when they have found the agencies contracting out in violation of law or regulation.  For example, in IFPTE, 64 FLRA 508 (2010) the arbitrator found the agency had failed to bargain with the union before contracting out work, but merely ordered the agency to comply with the law going forward.  Arbitrator Ira Jaffe did the same in AFGE, 64 FLRA 266 (2009).  Neither ordered a return to the status quo ante nor back pay for the earning opportunities lost by unit employees when their work was moved out the door.  But, speaking of doors, NTEU just kicked its way through the most fortified one protecting agencies.  It convinced an arbitrator to order the agency to take the work back from the contractor until it properly negotiated over moving it to an outside vendor and to pay the employees for the work they lost because it was sent outside the unit. Continue reading

Posted in A-76/Contracting | Tagged , | Leave a comment

HAS MSPB GUTTED ADVERSE ACTION PROTECTIONS?

It sure seems like that to us.  Imagine that you represent a group of ten GS-11 Claims Analysts, one GS-7 Claims Technician and one GS-5 Secretary. Then one day the group supervisor calls you to announce that she wants to give the Claims Analysts more overtime hours to catch up with the escalating backlog of cases.  However, because there is no money in the budget to pay for those hours, management has decided to furlough the group’s Secretary and Technician for the next 20 work days.  The money saved from not paying their salary will be used to pay for the Analysts’ overtime hours.  According to a new MSPB decision there is not a thing you can do about that. Why? Because the Board has just given managers virtual immunity to withhold 22 work days of pay a year if they want to use the money for other purpose. Continue reading

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action, Furloughs | Tagged | Leave a comment

DREADLOCK DISCRIMINATION

Although we do not hear much about agencies prohibiting dreadlocks, we doubt the issue is over forever.  So, take a minute to see how to push back against an agency demand to be dredlock-free. Check out the EEOC lawsuit. You never know when this bit of knowledge will be needed.

Posted in Race | Tagged | Leave a comment

MSPB SPLITS ON EMPLOYEE FURLOUGH RIGHTS

Is a furlough of 22 work days or less an adverse action or an adverse action “lite”?  The three MSPB members just issued a split decision on that and it promises to be the beginning of a very important dispute for federal employees as we move into the age of budget shutdowns, sequesters, and debt ceilings.  Here is a quick overview of what it could mean to employees and union clout. Continue reading

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action, Furloughs | Tagged | Leave a comment

HOW TO GRIEVE TEMPORARY PROMOTION DENIALS

Most Fed labor agreements require management to temporarily promote employees when it details them for more than some number of days in a year to a higher graded position, e.g., 30 days.  For literally an entire LR generation (and through four Presidential Administrations), unions could get back pay for employees assigned higher graded work no matter how long they were assigned to the work. AFGE, 2 FLRA 684 (1980); AFGE, 20 FLRA 684 (1985); IFPTE, 37 FLRA 1111 (1990); and NAAE, 51 FLRA 1220 (1996).  This was even allowed before there was a labor relations statute. (IAM, 5 FLRC 530 (1977))  Then, in 2004, just as the Commander-in-Chief was trying to take Social Security guarantees from older Americans, his Agitator-in-Chief at the FLRA (aka Dale Cabaniss), led a more successful effort to take away back pay from employees assigned to do more difficult work than hired to do for more than 120 days.  Continue reading

Posted in Back Pay, Promotion/Hiring | Tagged , | Leave a comment

SEPARATE BUT EQUAL PERFORMANCE AWARD SYSTEMS

In a country that knows more than a little bit about the vicious fallacy of a “separate but equal” approach to treating people, one would think there would be little tolerance for it in any venue. Yet, federal executives seem oblivious to how the current performance award programs they operate are precisely that.  HR managers act outright offended  at this accusation even though science proved to them over 50 years ago how destructive even a feeling of inequity among employees is to an organization. Consequently, it has fallen to union negotiating teams to be the modern-day equivalent of Freedom Riders if this is to change. Continue reading

Posted in Awards | Tagged | Leave a comment

THE COST OF UNDERFUNDING GOVERNMENT

While whining about the cost of government has become an obsession for some, this summer provided several examples of what happens when Americans do underfund their society. This week The Today Show focused on how many are required to buy flood insurance simply because Congress has not given FEMA enough money to update its flood zone maps. For some, that means paying an extra $25,000 over the life of a mortgage for something they will never need for a reason as incontrovertible as they live atop a hill. Continue reading

Posted in Editorial Opinion | Tagged | Leave a comment