THE “PLAINLY SUPERIOR” PROMOTION GRIEVANCE THEORY
Never heard of it? It is the argument to use when grieving non-selection from a list of properly ranked and rated best qualified employees. At least this is one of the ways. Here is how it worked for Gina Potter of the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Dept. of Agriculture in EEOC No. 0720120029 (Sept. 2013). Ms. Potter, a GS-7 employee, applied for promotion to a GS-8/9 position in the same line of work. Twelve employees applied for the two vacancies and when Potter was passed over, she filed an EEO charge claiming it was due to sex and race (Caucasian) discrimination. The agency rejected her complaint claiming that her experience and training were not as good as other candidates. It also claimed that she often created conflict needlessly. But when the EEOC hearing began, witnesses testified under oath, documentary evidence was uncovered, and the real fun began. Continue reading