WERE THESE NON-SELECTED EMPLOYEES ADEQUATELY COUNSELED BY MANAGEMENT?

Below are three paraphrased explanations Selecting Officials gave EEOC for not selecting three promotion applicants. Let’s assume that the Selecting Officials were just as open with the non-selected employees before EEOC got involved, took sworn affidavits from the Selecting Officials and put them under oath on a hearing witness stand.   Look them over and take a guess as to whether they are legally sufficient or not. Continue reading

Posted in EEO/Discrimination, Promotion/Hiring, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

REMEMBER THIS IMPASSE TECHNIQUE

When federal sector parties bargain themselves to an impasse, they routinely get an FMCS mediator involved.  When that does not generate a deal, they move on to the FSIP for a final and binding decision if the Panel cannot motivate them into a voluntary agreement. If you have ever gone that route you know that it can take months, if not a year, from the day you enter FMCS. The only alternative for those interested in a faster decisions is to hire a private neutral to provide a combination of mediation, fact-finding and arbitration. But that can cost money–a lot of money if the dispute is over a complete term contract. Given that each impasse resolution route has a serious drawback, everyone has needed a third option for a while–one that moves faster than traditional FSIP and cheaper than private assistance. NFFE”s passport unit just reminded us that there is a little used third option with the decision it got in NFFE, 2014 FSIP 89 (2015). Continue reading

Posted in Impasse | Tagged | Leave a comment

ORGANIZING YOUR ARBITRATION CASE – THE BASIC CHECKLIST

(Guest Contributor) You’ve taken your grievance through the contractual process without resolving it, and have now scheduled an arbitration on the matter.  How should your prepare? Is there a way to ensure that you’re ready for the hearing when the day approaches? Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHEN PERFORMANCE AWARDS ARE DISCRETIONARY

What’s a union to do when management distributes cash performance awards as it sees fit without any negotiated formal criteria?  A lot, even if the FSIP said the agency could do it that way. The agency still must comply with all relevant the laws and regulations–and there are several a union could use to make the agency regret insisting on total discretion. We have covered some in previous posts concerning disparate impact claims. So, let’s look at other responses by describing what it would look like if managers had complete discretion.  Continue reading

Posted in Awards | Tagged | Leave a comment

EXECUTIVE BOARD SEAT EQUALITY

Should seats on a union’s national executive board be distributed equally–and by equally we mean based on a relatively equal number of members represented by each board member?  We looked around the fed sector recently and found that many unions do not do that.  In fact, some differences are huge, e.g., in one union a single board member represents only1,600 unit members while two others on the same union board represent over 10,000 each. Another example revealed that the employees of one bargaining unit get two board seats to represent its 19,000 members while the approximately 19,000 members of another unit in the same union got 7 seats on the national executive board. We even found an example of the employees in the same bargaining unit being treated quite differently with one geographic group given a board seat even though it had only one-third the number of unit members as the employees in another geographic area who also were given only one board seats.

Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

IS THIS FLSA RETALIATION?

(By Guest Contributor) When a GS-6 employee complained to her supervisor that she was not getting paid for all the overtime she was working, the supervisor stopped giving her any overtime for a month. On her normal schedule, she would have worked 10 hours of overtime in the month. Can she claim she is the victim of FLSA retaliation if she only made an oral mention of her dissatisfaction just to her supervisor, not HR or via a grievance? Continue reading

Posted in FLSA/Overtime | Tagged | 2 Comments

HOW UNION CONVENTIONS ARE (OR ARE NOT) CONTROLLED

With the summer union convention season just getting underway, it is time to touch on the two-sided issue of convention control.  Every convention needs some control mechanisms if it is going to do any business, but control can also be excessive and get in the way of necessary changes timely responsive to the shifting future rather than the past. It is up to the delegates and members to decide where to draw that line. We are just going to point out some of the more common control mechanisms. Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | 1 Comment

NEW EVIDENCE OVERTURNS A COERCED RESIGNATION

Not long ago the MSPB overturned a resignation when the employee brought new evidence up after the hearing before the MSPB judge ruled. The Board accepted the evidence and also explained why it thought this resignation was coerced, which made it an adverse action taken without a hearing and agency decision.  So, MSPB reinstated the employee with back pay.  Here are the highlights of the case largely in the Board’s own words. (O’Brien v. Navy, 2015 MSPB 15 (2015)) Continue reading

Posted in MSPB | Tagged | Leave a comment

EARN MASTER’S IN LABOR STUDIES–WHILE WORKING

Given that thousands of federal employees are union activists as stewards, officers, etc., we thought we would pass on some information to our readers about what seems like a pretty good deal for those interested in boosting their skills, experiences and credentials in running a union.  The University of Massachusetts offers full time employees the opportunity to get a Master’s degree in Labor Studies through its Labor Relations and Research Center (LRRC). While many universities offer Master’s degree in Labor Relations, the UMass program is specifically designed for union leaders. If you are interested, click over to its Limited-Residency Program for Union Leaders web site.

Posted in Training, Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment

WANT TO KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT A POTENTIAL ARBITRATOR—FOR FREE?

Many times a year unions try to find out more about an arbitrator before they pick him/her to serve on a permanent panel or just to do a case.  The AFL-CIO lawyers operate an informal system sizing up how acceptable arbitrators are to unions. If you are willing to pay its subscribers’ fee, Cyberfeds.com keep tracks of the number of times an arbitrator finds for management, finds for the union or splits the case.  It even tracks information about how often their decisions are appealed to FLRA.  But both those sources are far less than perfect, e.g., they do not report on every decision an arbitrator has issued, the quality of the case the union put before him/her, etc.  Here is a source you may not know about. The FLRA reports on every decision where an arbitrator was involved in a federal sector case and one or both parties were so dissatisfied that they filed exceptions with FLRA. Here is how to use it. Continue reading

Posted in Arbitration | Tagged | Leave a comment