WANT TO BE A LABOR LAW EXPERT?

Here is one way to take a large step in that direction. The FLRA General Counsel’s Office recently posted its “Unfair Labor Practice Case Law Outline.”  It is 108 pages of summaries of recent and precedent-setting case decisions dealing with every ULP that local union leaders typically encounter. We recommend that the top representatives of every local page through the entire thing to refresh their recollection of the key points of law and download or bookmark a copy to use as the first resource to check when confronting a potential ULP.

Posted in ULPs | Tagged | Leave a comment

IFPTE ASSEMBLES FREE TRAINING POWERPOINTS

PowerPoint presentations have become the work horse of nearly every training session.  They make the presenter and union president look professional, they focus everyone in the room on the same message at the same time, and they are worlds cheaper to produce than training manuals. That’s why we recommend you visit the IFPTE, Local 12 web site.  The local has assembled on one page six PowerPoint presentations FLRA prepared that any union local can use to train its stewards and reps.  And when we say “use,” we mean more than using them unchanged.  Nothing bars any local from putting its own coverage on the presentation, modifying it to add references to local agency problems, updating it, inserting art or case problems, etc.

Posted in FLRA | Tagged | 1 Comment

10 BARGAINING ISSUES AROUND PHASED RETIREMENT

Now that OPM has finally issued regulations to implement the phased retirement program (PRP), it is time for unions to prepare bargaining demands. Here are some that would be on our list. Continue reading

Posted in Bargaining, Phased Retirement | Tagged | Leave a comment

LEO, AUO, FLSA and 5 CFR 610

When can a federal law enforcement officer (LEO) claim FLSA time and one-half overtime pay if he already is paid administratively uncontrollable overtime (AUO) to work hours beyond the normal 40 hour shift? Continue reading

Posted in Overtime | Tagged | Leave a comment

A “UNILATERAL CHANGE” GRIEVANCE TIP

Assume that your contract has a clause that mirrors the statutory obligation to bargain, i.e., it obligates management to notify and bargain over any midterm changes in working conditions before implementing them.  Further assume that management makes a unilateral change and you decide to file a grievance charging it with violating the statutory obligation to bargain found at 5 USC 7116(a)(5).  Can you figure out what you just did wrong? Continue reading

Posted in Grievance/Arbitration | Tagged | Leave a comment

NLRB ORDERS MAKE WHOLE REMEDY FOR WEINGARTEN VIOLATION, BUT WILL FLRA?

What’s the remedy when an employee is terminated for refusing to participate in a disciplinary investigation of his/her behavior, despite the fact that the employer refused to give the employee a reasonable opportunity to get a union rep involved?  In the federal sector FLRA has rejected a “make whole” remedy reinstating the employee or giving back pay because it claims it needs to balance the government’s need to be efficient with the employee’s statutory rights. Check out AFGE, 55 FLRA 1250 (2000) for the Authority’s rationale. However, the NLRB has just decided that a make whole remedy is appropriate not just when management refuses to let the employee have a union rep, but also when it fails to give the employee reasonable time to get one. Check out the Labor Relations Today story describing the Board’s decision. It will be interesting to see if the Authority follows the Board because we at FEDSMILL have no clue as to why it interferes with agency efficiency to reinstate an employee when he is terminated due to an agency’s illegal unilateral change in working conditions, but not when his other statutory rights are violated. Given the Board’s decision, union reps should be demanding a full “make whole” remedy any time the so-called Weingarten right is violated–at least until we see if the Authority follows or rejects the Board’s thinking.

Posted in Discipline/Adverse Action | Tagged | Leave a comment

SPECIAL COUNSEL BREACHES CBP’S HUMAN RESOURCES BUNKER

We have been saying it for a while.  The HR/LR operation at Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency has little respect for the law. Check out these two FEDSMILL postings: CBP/DHS, LIKE A FISH, IS ROTTING FROM THE HEAD FIRST and LR’S BIGGEST LOSERS. AFGE and NTEU deserve credit for pursuing CBP’s illegal/improper personnel actions like a hungry junk yard dog.  They sank their litigation teeth in nearly a decade ago and have not let go while they wait for FLRA and possibly the courts to tell CBP leadership that this game is over and it is time to start writing checks to all the employees it cheated out of money.  But now the two unions have a new ally that has opened a third front for CBP’s besieged HR leaders.  The U. S. Special Counsel has opened an investigation into alleged deliberate efforts by a former Commissioner and his HR folks to ignore merit rules to give three people very high paying CBP jobs. We do not know the status of the investigation, but we did notice on USAJOBS.gov that CBP is looking to fill a recent vacancy in its top HR job. Stay tuned for an update on the Special Counsel investigation as well as any resolution of the multi-million dollar grievance claims the two unions have pending.

Posted in Special Counsel | Leave a comment

NFFE GOES A LITTLE LESS FEDERAL

Here is something to watch.  The National Federation of Federal Employees just announced it now represents private sector, non-federal, non-governmental workers.  In July, the NLRB certified it as the representative of the “Golden Triangle Business Improvement District” employees, whose parent company of “Block-by-Block,” which is part of the “SMS Holdings Company.”  We are happy for NFFE and for the now union-represented employees.    Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A “PARTICULARIZED NEED” BARGAINING TABLE TIP

See if you can figure out how the following situation could have been better handled by both parties—and the FLRA.  The union filed a grievance alleging the agency failed to pay unit employees for overtime hours they worked.  It simultaneously also filed an information request for time card records needed to help it proves its overtime allegation.  When the agency denied the information request, the union filed another grievance over that and took that case to arbitration.  The arbitrator had to issue two decisions and in the second the union “kind of” won.  However, FLRA overturned the arbitrator, ruled against the union, and now the parties go back to the beginning to reactivate the first grievance filed in 2012 claiming back pay to 2006. Continue reading

Posted in Grievance/Arbitration, Information | Tagged | Leave a comment

WHAT IS THE IFPTE?

To begin, it is the latest union to organize a new group of federal employees, and for that we pass on our Congrats. But beyond that it is a union that has quietly served notice on the much bigger and better known federal sector unions such as AFGE, NTEU, AFSCME and SEIU that it intends to be a player in the federal government, especially among the more professional occupations.  For example, its newest unit brings to over 2,000 the number of federal Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) it represents—and that raises the question of why white collar, professionals employees in very high profile agencies are choosing IFPTE over those other unions.  After all, what union would not want to represent employees at the— Continue reading

Posted in Union Administration | Tagged | Leave a comment